Legal Opinion
United States v. Scott
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 18, 1996No. 3:95CV1216(AHN)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
NEVAS, District Judge.
In this civil action, the United States and the State of Connecticut (collectively the “United States”) allege that the defendants, Stanley Scott (“Scott”), Bobby Riley (“Riley”), and Carmen Vazquez (“Vazquez”) (collectively the “defendants”) violated the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, 18 U.S.C. § 248 (1994) (“FACE”). The United States alleges that Scott, Riley, and Vazquez repeatedly have used force, threats of force, and physical obstruction against the staff, escorts, clients, and companions of clients of the Summit Women’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cheffer v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Regina Rene DinwiddieCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doe v. DoeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- United States v. WeslinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Nathan Wall (95-5007) and Donald Wall (95-5008)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996