Legal Opinion
Devoy & Kuhn Coal & Coke Co. v. Huttig
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 19, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Muscatine District Court. — M. F. Donegan, Judge. Action on a promissory note resulted in a directed verdict and judgment thereon for defendants. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The action is against ITuttig and Blackwell as endorsers on the following note:
“Summit Lumber Company
“Manufacturers of
“Soft Short Leaf Yellow Pine Timber
“$1,169.40 St. Louis, Mo., February 2nd, 1914.
“One month after date we promise to pay to the order of Devoy & Kuhn Coal & Coke Co., eleven hundred sixty-nine and 40/100 dollars at our office, 1014 Wright Bldg., St. Louis, Mo. Value received. Interest 6 per cent, per annum from date.
No. 2640 Summit Lumber Company,
Due 3-2-14 By Aylmer Flenniken, Treas.
‘ ‘ Endorsed as follows:
“1014 Wright Bldg.,
“Arkansas Southeastern R. R.
“J. S. Blackwell,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vander Ploeg v. Van ZuukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Glidden v. ChamberlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Ward v. HackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Builders Lime & Cement Co. v. WeimerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Johnston v. HooverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fairley v. FalconSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Marion Savings Bank v. LeahySupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Home Savings Bank v. KelleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1928