Legal Opinion

Marion Savings Bank v. Leahy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 25, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

The defendants, in answer to plaintiff’s petition, pleaded that the instrument sued on had been altered, after signature by the defendants, changing the time and place of payment and rate of interest; also that they signed the note in blank, with the agreement and understanding with the maker thereof that the note was to be made for $1,000; and that, in violation of said agreement, the maker filled in $2,500 as the consideration of the note. Plaintiff replies by saying that it denies the alleged agreement as to the amount of the note, and pleads further that, with knowledge of the alteration…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vander Ploeg v. Van ZuukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Builders Lime & Cement Co. v. WeimerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Stiebel v. HaigneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Cutler v. RoseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. Devoy & Kuhn Coal & Coke Co. v. HuttigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Abodeely v. CavrasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  2. Curlee Clothing Co. v. WickliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Citizens State Bank v. MartensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. WoodsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. TroupSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API