Hewitt v. State

WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., J.

In this appeal, Joshua Daniel Hewitt ("Hewitt") challenges the judgment of the motion court following an evidentiary hearing denying his amended Rule 24.0351 motion to set aside his convictions for tampering with a motor vehicle and forgery. Because the motion court's denial of Hewitt's Rule 24.035 motion was not clearly erroneous, we affirm.2

Facts and Procedural Background

In reciting the facts of this matter, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the motion court's judgment. Day v. State , 495 S.W.3d 773, 774 (Mo. App. S.D. 2016). We include only…