Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Hinkle

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1898No. 2,494PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prom the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

Appellees, Abner T. and Edward W. Bowen and John A.. Cartwright, under the firm name of A. T. Bowen & Co., sued appellees, James H. Hinkle and Josiah Appleton, on a note executed by them to said firm. The payers of the note appeared and filed a cross-complaint, making the payees and appellant, Anthony Hinkle, cross-defendants. Summons was issued on the cross-complaint, and Anthony Hinkle brought into court. The substance of the cross-complaint was that the note sued on was given for money borrowed of A. T. Bowen & Co. by James H. Hinkle; that Appleton was surety thereon; that after the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Halstead v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Fensler v. PratherIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Huffmond v. BenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Boys v. SimmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miami County Bank v. State ex rel. Peru Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Tibbet v. ZurbuchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Clements v. VanausdallIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State ex rel. FinleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Kidder Press Co. v. United Wrapping Machine Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API