Legal Opinion

Tibbet v. Zurbuch

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1899No. 2,039PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Allen Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

— Appellee was plaintiff below, and bottomed Ms action upon the following contract: “In consideration of the sale and delivery to me of the stock of goods and per*355sonal property by George Zurbuch as evidenced by his bill of sale therefor to me given, the consideration thereof being stated as $1,912, I agree to and with the said George Zurbuch to assume the payment of the following described notes: Three notes dated January 16, 1888, calling for $500 each and executed to Solomon Eothsehild by said George Zurbuch, Francis J. Zurbuch and Harmon Tibbet as security, and one note dated October 23,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Jones v. CullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Batman v. SnoddyIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DuganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. LevyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oolitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Dark v. MannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API