Legal Opinion

Fensler v. Prather

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Bartholomew Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.

This was an action by Fensler, the appellant, against Prather, the appellee, and one Valhowe, upon a promissory note executed by the defendants, as partners, in their firm name of Prather & Valhowe, to Fensler. Valhowe having become bankrupt, the action as to him was dismissed, and therefore no further notice of him as a party need be taken.

Prather answered as follows: 1. Payment.

“ 2. That after the execution of said note, defendants dissolved their said partnership, and by the terms of the dissolution, said Valhowe retained all outstanding liabilities in favor of said firm, and was to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Halstead v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Kaufman v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Kingan v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Shook v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Maxwell v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Kelso v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Pope v. VajenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Davis v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API