Legal Opinion

Clements v. Vanausdall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1913No. 22,497PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Montgomery Circuit Court; Jere West, Judge. Action by Calvin Breaks against William G. Hudson and others, in which the defendant, John L. Yanausdall filed a cross-complaint against the defendant, Andrew S. Clements. From a judgment against him on such cross-complaint, the defendant Clements appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.

Calvin Breaks instituted a suit on a promissory note against Hudson, Walton, appellant Clements and appellee Yanausdall. The complaint alleges that Hudson *491and Walton executed their note payable to the order of Vanausdall, who indorsed it to the defendant Clements, and that the latter sold and transferred it before maturity, by delivery, without indorsement, to the plaintiff, and that Clements is made a defendant to answer as to the sale and transfer. The latter answered, disavowing any interest in the note. Vanausdall filed a cross-complaint against Clements, in which it is alleged that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gipson v. OgdenIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Harker v. GlidewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Boys v. SimmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Watson v. BeaboutIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Brown v. SummersIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hedges v. MehringIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API