Legal Opinion

State v. Sly

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 13, 1990No. 24291-1-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.

— James Sly appeals convictions of three counts of robbery in the second degree. He first contends that the information was defective because it failed to allege the element of intent, a nonstatutory element of robbery. He also contends that the trial court abused its discretion in imposing an exceptional sentence.

I

Based on an incident which occurred about 1 a.m. on August 9, 1988, James Sly was charged with four counts of robbery in the second degree. He was convicted on three of the counts. The information charged these three counts as follows:

That the defendant James Lavell Sly, together…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. HoltWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. ChaddertonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. PaineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Fusato v. Washington Interscholastic Activities Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API