Legal Opinion

Fusato v. Washington Interscholastic Activities Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 28, 1999No. 17526-0-IIIPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Tomoe Fusato challenges the Washington Interscholastic Activities Association’s (WIAA) residence and transfer rules, which, with few exceptions, forbid students from playing varsity athletics if they did not relocate to a school district with their parents. The superior court reversed the administrative decision against Ms. Fusato and found the WIAA’s rules violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. Although the matter is moot, we proceed and decide the trial court did not err taking judicial notice of certain facts. We conclude that although no fundamental right is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. Dept. of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Willoughby v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Merseal v. State Dept. of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler v. STATE, DSHSWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API