Legal Opinion

State v. Gore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2001No. 65376-3PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

Defendant Paul C. Gore challenges his convictions for two counts of first degree rape and two counts of attempted first degree rape. He contends that he *293was improperly denied a Franks1 hearing on the sufficiency of an affidavit in support of probable cause to issue a search warrant for blood and saliva samples, and photographs of the defendant; that the trial court erred in admitting DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) evidence; that the trial court erred in imposing exceptional sentences where the factual basis for imposing exceptional sentences upward was not charged, submitted to the jury, and…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API