Legal Opinion
Fridman v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 5, 2002No. 97 CIV. 6099(VM)PublishedCited by 308 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mikhail Fridman (“Fridman”), represented by the law firm of Rosen, Preminger & Bloom (the “Attorneys”), brought this action against defendants the City of New York, HS Systems, Inc., New York City Commissioner of Social Services Marva Livingston Hammons and Dr. Aurelio Salon Jr. (collectively “Defendants”). Defendants brought motions for summary judgment against all of Frid-man’s claims. Fridman retained the Attorneys under a contingency fee agreement dated July 22, 1997 (the “Retainer”), which was submitted as an attachment to Fridman’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Carl D. Potnick v. Eastern State Hospital, Carl D. Potnick v. Suffolk PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc., Dba Sears Real Estate and Charles W. Sears, Appeal of Charles W. SearsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by308 opinions
- El Ameen Bey v. StumpfDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- BURDA MEDIA INC. v. BlumenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Waltner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Hodge v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2011
- Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
303 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.