Legal Opinion
Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc., Dba Sears Real Estate and Charles W. Sears, Appeal of Charles W. Sears
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 27, 1988No. 496, Docket 88-7613PublishedCited by 200 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, Munson, C.J., dated June 23, 1988, 686 F.Supp. 385. Appellant pro se Charles W. Sears contends that the district court erred in denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (1982) and in denying appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d).
The judgment is affirmed.
An interlocutory appeal may be taken from an order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis under the doctrine of Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Allen Hodge v. Police Officers: Colon, 623 and Repuerto, 145Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. First National Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Carl D. Potnick v. Eastern State Hospital, Carl D. Potnick v. Suffolk PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Vincent Oliva v. Kirby HellerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by200 opinions
- Lister v. Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Adv. Council v. James Rowland, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie BandaccariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Steven M. Desrosiers v. John J. MoranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Fridman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Foster v. Cuyahoga Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
195 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.