Legal Opinion
BURDA MEDIA INC. v. Blumenberg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 5, 2010No. 97 Civ. 7167PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Petitioner Christian Viertel (“Viertel”) has applied for leave to appeal in forma pauperis this Court’s denial of his motion to vacate the default judgment. For the following reasons, the application is denied.
Prior Proceedings
On September 24, 1997, plaintiffs Hubert Burda Media, Inc. (formerly known as Burda Media, Inc.) and Hubert Burda Media Holding GmbH & Co. (formerly known as Burda Holding, GmbH & Co. KG) (collectively “Burda”) commenced this action to recover monetary damages, restitution, and other relief. The defendants included Fritz G.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fridman v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Burda Media, Inc. v. ViertelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Linden v. Harper and Row PublishersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
3Cited by51 opinions
- Agramonte v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Alfonso v.LaMannaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Alfonso v.LaMannaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Ambiorix Duval Flores v. United States of America; United States of America v. Ambiorix Duval FloresDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Ambiorix Duval Flores v. United States of America; United States of America v. Ambiorix Duval FloresDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.