Legal Opinion

Shaffer v. Glander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1950No. 31962PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We agree with the Tax Commissioner's statement:

"It is the use of the fuel which is determinative and, if fuel is used to propel a motor vehicle upon the highway, such fuel is taxable." But that is not our case here.

Unless the applicable statutes show clearly that the use of the fuel as here used is taxable, any ambiguity shall be resolved in favor of the taxpayer.

This well settled rule is illustrated by the language of Judge Marshall in the case of Caldwell v. State, 115 Ohio St. 458,461, 154 N.E. 792:

"The rule which has been often declared, and which was followed in that case [Cassidy v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cassidy v. EllerhorstOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Phoenix Refining Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Globe Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Lakefront Lines, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API