Lakefront Lines, Inc. v. Tracy
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We hold that Lakefront specified all the errors it claims, but we rule that motor fuel used for air conditioning and idle time is used for the propulsion of or driving-motor vehicles upon public highways. Thus, we hold that R.C. 5735.14 does not exempt the fuel consumed for these uses from the motor fuel tax.
First, as to raising the issue of idling consumption, Lakefront supported some of its applications for refund with calculations that included refund amounts for fuel used while the buses were idling. Furthermore, in paragraphs 11 and 12 of its notices of appeal to the BTA, Lakefront…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Ares, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Vought Industries, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Shaffer v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Zalud Oldsmobile, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Anderson/Maltbie Partnership v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Campus Bus Service v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- In re Estate of RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Columbus Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.