Legal Opinion

Leach v. . Varley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaRksoh, J.

In the plaintiff’s brief the main question involved is stated as follows: “Did the court discharge its duty as directed by sec. 564 of the Consolidated Statutes of Horth Carolina, in the various aspects of the case, as set forth in plaintiff appellant’s exceptions?” We think so.

Fred Yarley, the defendant, owned a 1929-model Dodge sedan automobile, and at the time that the plaintiff’s intestate, Lois Leach, was killed, it was being driven by his son, Robert Yarley, who was some nineteen years of age and living with his father. There was plenary evidence to the effect that the automobile was in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. GladmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Matthews v. . CheathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Alexander v. . StatesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Hoots v. BeesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Charles v. DougalDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API