Legal Opinion

Matthews v. . Cheatham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1936PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The material exceptions and assignments of error made by defendants, are as follows: “For that the court erred in refusing to grant defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. For that the court erred in refusing to grant defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of all the evidence. For that the court erred in refusing to grant defendants’ motion to charge the jury as follows: 'I charge you, gentlemen of the jury, that, if you find the facts to be as testified to by all of the witnesses, it will be your duty to answer the third issue…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robertson ex rel. King v. AldridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Watts v. . LeflerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Grier v. . WoodsideSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Eaves Ex Rel. Eaves v. CoxeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Wallace v. SquiresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cole v. KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Cole v. . KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Tart v. RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Ewing v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API