Legal Opinion

Montaney v. J-M Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 23, 2013No. 69364-6-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVerellen, J.

¶1 The trial court granted summary judgment dismissing Thomas and Maijorie Montaney’s claim against J-M Manufacturing (JMM) arising from Thomas’s exposure to asbestos from pipe JMM sold. At the summary judgment hearing, evidence was presented that (1) Thomas Montaney was repeatedly exposed to asbestos dust while working with asbestos concrete (A/C) pipe between 1972 and 1990; (2) he purchased A/C pipe from a single distributor, Pacific Water Works, into the 1980s; and (3) Pacific carried A/C pipe sold by JMM in 1983 and 1984. This evidence is sufficient for a jury to reasonably infer that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Drinkwitz v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Era Clevenger v. John Crane, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. Michael Farrow And Lidia Farrow, Apps. v. Flowserve Us, Inc., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API