Legal Opinion
Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1987No. 53061-1PublishedCited by 191 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
Albert and Dorothy Lockwood brought this action against a number of manufacturers of asbestos products, including petitioner Raymark Industries, seeking damages for injuries resulting from Albert Lockwood's exposure to asbestos products while he worked at various Seattle shipyards. A jury returned a verdict of $183,372 in favor of the Lockwoods. Raymark appealed and the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment on the verdict. Lockwood v. A C & S, Inc., 44 Wn. App. 330, 772 P.2d 826 (1986). In this petition for review, Raymark argues that Lockwood failed to present sufficient…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Aubrey Hendrix v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Martin v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by191 opinions
- Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Hizey v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court · 1992
186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.