Legal Opinion

Michael Farrow And Lidia Farrow, Apps. v. Flowserve Us, Inc., Res.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 3, 2014No. 69917-2Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MICHAEL FARROW and LIDIA FARROW, No. 69917-2-1 Appellants, DIVISION ONE PUBLISHED IN PART OPINION ALFA LAVAL, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY t-3 c •", cz and SHARPLES CORPORATION); c=> •.— ANCHOR/DARLING VALVE rn COMPANY; AURORA PUMP COMPANY; BEAIRD COMPANY; I BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in- interest to BUFFALO FORGE COMPANY); BW/IP INTERNATIONAL, CO INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BYRON JACKSON PUMP COMPANY); CAMERON INTERNATIONAL…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. TerrovonaWashington Supreme Court · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API