Legal Opinion

Cerrillo v. Esparza

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2006No. 77283-5PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Fairhurst, J.

Petitioners, Esparza Truck, Inc., and its owners (Esparza),1 challenge a Court of Appeals decision affirming a grant of partial summary judgment to the respondent truck drivers (truckers) for unpaid overtime wages under the Washington Minimum Wage Act (MWA), chapter 49.46 RCW. Esparza asserts that the plain language of RCW 49.46.130(2)(g)(ii), part of the MWA, exempts *198the company from the requirement to pay overtime wages because the truckers transport agricultural commodities. Esparza argues that because the plain language of the statute is not ambiguous, it was improper for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Kilian v. AtkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Alaska Airlines v. Judy SchurkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Tesoro Refining & Marketing v. State, DorWashington Supreme Court · 2008

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API