State v. Francum
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendant first contends that the items contained inside the paper bag were the products of an unconstitutional search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment, and they should have been excluded from evidence. Defendant argues that Trooper Church did not have probable cause to justify a search of defendant’s automobile and that the warrantless search resulting in seizure of the contents of the paper bag cannot be justified under any of the exceptions for automobile searches.
A “search” proscribed by the Fourth Amendment contemplates an unreasonable governmental intrusion into an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. MotleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. VazquezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014