State v. Hall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
The dispositive issue brought forward by defendant in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence of the LSD tablets at trial. In this respect, defendant believes his conviction must be reversed on either of the following two theories: (1) that his vehicle was improperly seized on 9 April 1979, thereby rendering any subsequent search of its contents invalid and unreasonable or (2) that the officers’ search of a closed medicine bottle exceeded the permissible scope of a valid inventory search of a lawfully impounded vehicle.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- State v. MotleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. One 1994 Ford ThunderbirdNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- State v. MackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982