Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1983No. 8225SC1124PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

At the outset, we note that defendant’s brief does not contain a non-argumentative summary of the material facts as required *417by Rule 28(b)(3), Rules of Appellate Procedure. Failure to comply with this rule slows our work by requiring us to read through the entire lengthy transcript to determine the facts of the case. We have, however, elected to consider the case on its merits.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence of the bottles found in his briefcase. Defendant bases his argument on appeal solely…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Delaware Republican State Committee v. RedfearnSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matthews v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API