Painsolvers, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, (2) DETERMINING FACTS NOT AT ISSUE PURSUANT TO RULE 56(d), (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION, AND (4) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S COUNTER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On May 20, 2009, Plaintiff Painsolvers, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Painsolvers”), a professional corporation authorized to provide personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits to claimants in the state of Hawai’i, filed a complaint against Defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance…