Legal Opinion
(PC) Perez v. Smith
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 10, 2022No. 1:20-cv-00840Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SANDRO S. PEREZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00840-DAD-SAB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONTINUE CONSIDERATION OF 12 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, REQUEST TO REOPEN 13 A. SMITH, et al., DISCOVERY, AND SUA SPONTE GRANTING PLAINTIFF ADDITIONAL 14 Defendants. TIME TO FILE AN OPPOSITION 15 (ECF No. 72) 16 17 Plaintiff Sandro S. Perez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Paddington Partners v. Jean-Louis Bouchard, Herbert A. Denton, Econocom Finance Nv Econocom International N v. Jeffries & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Raymond Vincent Nidds v. Schindler Elevator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.