Legal Opinion

(PC) Drake v. Kernan

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 15, 2023No. 1:17-cv-01500Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SAM DRAKE, Case No. 1:17-cv-01500-ADA-SAB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF AN EXPERT 12 v. WITNESS AND LEAVE TO TAKE DISCOVERY, AND GRANTING 13 SCOTT KERNAN, et al., PLAINTIFF THIRTY DAYS TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 136) 15 16 Plaintiff Sam Drake is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of an expert witness and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Raymond Vincent Nidds v. Schindler Elevator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Kitsap Physicians ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Norman E. Tedder v. Edward Odel, Cpl., James Scott McAlisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API