Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Washburn

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2008No. 24551PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*299ROEHR, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] Edith G. Harmon (Edith) and Joseph Harmon (Joseph) (collectively Har-mons) brought a negligence action for personal injuries against Anita M. Washburn (Washburn). The trial court denied Har-mons’ motion for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of Washburn’s negligence and on the issue of Edith’s contributory negligence. The jury returned a general verdict denying Harmons’ claim.1 The trial court then denied Harmons’ renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and, alternatively, for a new trial. Har-mons appeal the denial of their motions. We reverse and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bridge v. Karl's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Parker v. Casa Del Rey-Rapid City, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Alley v. SiepmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Treib v. KernSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. ALVINE FAMILY LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. HagemannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Baddou v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Selle v. TozserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. JAS Enterprises, Inc. v. BBS Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API