Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Selle v. Tozser

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2010No. 25389PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] James and Rosemary Selle (Selles) sued James Tozser for tortious interference with Selles’ business relationship with Frank Tozser, James Tozser’s brother. Selles also asserted liability on a theory of civil conspiracy. The jury returned a verdict for Selles in an amount representing the balance of Frank’s unpaid promissory note to Selles, prejudgment interest on the unpaid note, and punitive damages. James Tozser (James) appeals the denial of his renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law or new trial. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶ 2.] We restate the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beck v. PrupisSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Isaac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Qwest Communications Corp. v. Free Conferencing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. Huether v. Mihm Transportation Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Estate of TankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Brown v. HansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API