Legal Opinion

People v. Weibert

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1937No. Crim. 2897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DESMOND, J., pro tem.

Defendant was convicted in a jury trial upon seventeen counts presented in two consolidated cases, and has appealed from each judgment of conviction. The appeal was grounded upon various specifications, but by his brief appellant has abandoned all grounds except the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgments. In order to determine the validity of the objection, as directed to each of the judgments, and because the defendant has been sentenced to state prison on all counts, nine of the terms to run consecutively, it has been necessary for .us to read the entire…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. People v. RaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. People v. Von BadenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. In Re ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. People v. OttermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. SearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API