Legal Opinion

Plucker v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1928No. File No. 5847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

Appellant, plaintiff below, alleges he was seriously injured, and; his automobile completely destroyed by a collision with defendant’s train, on August 4, 1921.

He claimed damages to his person in the sum of $10,000, and to his automobile in the sum of $500.

On the trial plaintiff had a verdict and judgment against both defendants for $7,500.

Defendants were granted a new trial on the sole ground that;

“The evidence shows that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, as a matter of law, barring a recovery against the defendants in this action.”

From this order plaintiff appealed.

Tire…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Monroe v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. Cathcart v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ulrikson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bock v. SellersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Schuknecht v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Wilson v. Great Northern Railway CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API