Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wilson v. Great Northern Railway Company

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1968No. File 10394Published

1DissentHanson, Presiding Judge

Summary judgment is a relatively new addition to our rules of civil practice. It may be conceded to be an extreme and drastic pretrial remedy which should be granted only "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." RCP 56(c). Furthermore, issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and proxi*218mate cause are not ordinarily susceptible to summary adjudication. 6 Moore's Federal Practice…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Tony Lopez v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Ulrikson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Johnson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Schuknecht v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API