Legal Opinion
Roe v. City of Waterbury
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 11, 2008No. Docket 07-0261-cvPublishedCited by 844 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-appellants, Susan Roe, Jr. and Jane Doe, Jr. (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), appeal from a summary judgment entered on September 28, 2006 which was certified and entered as a final partial summary judgment on November 16, 2006, in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Underhill, J.) in favor of defendant-appellee the City of Waterbury (the “City” or “Waterbury”). The District Court held that the City could not be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for acts of sexual abuse committed by the former Mayor of Waterbury, Philip Gior-dano…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by844 opinions
- Cash v. County of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Fincher v. Depository Trust and Clearing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Hu v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Ruiz v. County of RocklandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Sunny Merchandise Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
839 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.