Kohrman v. Cincinnati Zoning Board of Appeals
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants consist of a group of Mount Adams residents who have, for over two years, been contesting the city’s approval of a condominium project proposed by defendant-appellee Menke Development. The residents appeal the trial court’s judgment upholding two related decisions of the Cincinnati Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”), both of which granted Menke permission to proceed with its project. In three assignments of error, the residents allege (1) that the trial court erred in finding that the ZBA and the city’s hearing examiner, who first heard this case,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Henley v. City of Youngstown Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Carter v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Franchise Developers, Inc. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ProTerra, Inc. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Citylink Center v. City of Cincinnati, Unpublished Decision (11-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Kohrman v. Cincinnati Zoning Board of Appeals, C-060704 (7-6-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007