Legal Opinion

Kohrman v. Cincinnati Zoning Board of Appeals, C-060704 (7-6-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 2007No. Nos. C-060704, C-060709Published

1Opinion of the Court

Please note: This case has been removed from the accelerated calendar.

OPINION.

{¶ 1} These consolidated appeals concern a proposed construction project on the hillside of Mount Adams. Plaintiffs-appellants, residents of Mount Adams ("the residents"), contest defendant-appellee Menke Development's planned construction of luxury condominiums on the hillside. The Cincinnati Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") vacated and modified conditions that had been imposed upon Menke's project. The residents appeal from the trial court's judgment upholding the ZBA's decisions.

{¶ 2} The residents have filed two…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pembaur v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Duncan v. Village of MiddlefieldOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Beneficial Ohio, Inc. v. Primero, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Kohrman v. Cincinnati Zoning Board of AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API