Brock v. Martinovich
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Twenty-third District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Thornton, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court:
The defendant Splivalo was sued by the fictitious name of John Doe. Both he and his codefendant were regularly served with process, and both failed to appear in the cause. The default of each was duly entered, and afterward, the case coming on regularly to be heard, the plaintiff’s attorney asked and obtained leave of the Court to insert in the complaint the true name of Splivalo in lieu of the fictitious name by which he was sued; and thereupon, the Court, after hearing the necessary proof, gave judgment in accordance with the prayer of the complaint.
Splivalo appeals from the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Kittle v. BellegardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Steinbauer v. BondesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Ligare v. California Southern RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- McDonald v. SwettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.