Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1996No. 22425PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a conditional plea of guilty and from the resulting judgment of conviction and sentences for the offenses of delivery of a controlled substance (I.C. § 37-2732(a)(1)(A)), money laundering (I.C. § 18-8201), and failure to pay income tax (I.C. § 63-3022).

Ross raises the following issues on appeal:

1. Were his convictions for delivery of a controlled substance and for money laundering barred by the doctrine of double jeopardy due to the prior civil forfeiture of his property in actions brought under I.C. § 37-2744?

2. Were his sentences unreasonable in light of the facts and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State v. WheatonIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. SarabiaIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. RevenaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. HarmonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. DreierIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Ross v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API