Legal Opinion

State v. Sarabia

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1994No. 20440, 20576 and 20583PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

These are drug trafficking cases that have been consolidated on appeal. The primary issue presented is the constitutionality and enforceability of the portion of I.C. § 37-2732B (the drug trafficking statute) that provides minimum fixed terms of imprisonment from which the trial court may deviate only upon motion of the prosecuting attorney. We conclude that these fixed terms are not authorized by art. 5, § 13 of the Idaho Constitution, and, therefore, invade the inherent authority of the court and are unconstitutional, null, void, and unenforceable.

I

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. HaggardIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. PizzutoIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. BinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. WhiteIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. Valdez-MolinaIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. FieldsIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. AgundisIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State v. McAwayIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API