Legal Opinion
State v. Revenaugh
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1999No. 24350PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Chief Justice.
Tod M. Revenaugh appeals from the district judge’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Revenaugh argues that because the warrant authorizing the search of his residence was based in part on information obtained from at least one, and possibly two illegal searches, the warrant is invalid and all evidence seized pursuant to that warrant should have been suppressed. Because we believe that the motion was properly denied, we affirm.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 5, 1997, Deputy Stewart Miller of the Kootenai County Sheriffs office was dispatched to a business on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. CelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- State v. BollSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. ElisonIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.