Legal Opinion
Custom Undergarment Corp. v. R. H. Macy & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 3, 1944No. 192PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought in the District Court for the Southern District of New York by Custom Undergarment Corporation, the exclusive licensee, and by Mildred B. Teamer, the owner and patentee, for a temporary and permanent injunction and to recover damages for the alleged infringement of U. S. Patent No. 2,221,851 granted November 19, 1940, for a gown. The original defendant, R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., admittedly sold the accused garment after the patent was granted. It was manufactured by Jack Beckerman, Inc., which was allowed to intervene, to take over the defense and to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Mitchell v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Kemper-Thomas Co. v. J. P. Gordon Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Wilkins Shoe-Button Fastener Co. v. WebbU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1898
- Typewriters Hilliardized, Inc. v. Corona Typewriter Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Consolidated Car Heating Co. v. Chrome-Gold Alloys Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1952
- Powell Manufacturing Co. v. Long Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1970
- Doughboy Industries, Inc. v. GoffDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1953
- Kool Vent Metal Awning Corp. of America v. American Beauty Ventilated Aluminum Awning Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954