Legal Opinion
Typewriters Hilliardized, Inc. v. Corona Typewriter Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 4, 1930No. 332PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff’s patent was granted to Frederic W. HiUiard May 25, 1909. His original application was filed August 25, 1896. It was divided, and the patent in suit issued on the application filed November 18, 1904. No typewriters were made in accordance with the patent, and it expired before decision' below.
Hilliard wanted to combine visibility in a typewriter with the wearing qualities then obtainable only in an invisible machine. He recognized the great durability and stability of alignment which.had been obtained by using type bars mounted on a full ring with room for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- McCormick v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harries v. Air King Products Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Good Roads Co. v. Charles Hvass & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Custom Undergarment Corp. v. R. H. Macy & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Millie Patent Holding Co. v. Joseph Tetley & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931