Legal Opinion
Powell Manufacturing Co. v. Long Manufacturing Co.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided October 29, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 876PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*25OPINION
WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Powell Manufacturing Company, Inc., and R. H. Bouligny, Inc., are the assignees of two patents which were granted to Dr. Francis J. Hassler. The patents include (1) Apparatus for Bulk Curing Tobacco, Patent No. 3,105,-713, granted October 1, 1963, and (2) Method for Bulk Curing Tobacco, Patent No. 3,110,326, granted November 12, 1963. The plaintiffs claim that these patents are valid and that the defendant, Long Manufacturing Company, has infringed them.
DR. HASSLER’S BACKGROUND AND HIS ORIGINS IN BULK CURING
The facts surrounding this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Egbert v. LippmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Ab Iro v. Otex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
- Huell v. BevMo Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Ibarra-Perez v. HowardDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020