Legal Opinion
Hayes v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 13, 1995No. 33342-9-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Baker, A.C.J.
The City of Seattle (City) appeals from summary judgment and an award of attorney fees in favor of Michael Hayes in an action for damages caused by the City Council’s (Council) improper imposition of conditions on Hayes’ master use permit. The City contends Hayes’ damage claim under RCW 64.40 is time barred and that Hayes’ action for damages is precluded under res judicata. We hold that Hayes’ action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 is not precluded by res judicata and affirm summary judgment for Hayes under that theory.
Hayes applied to the City for a master use permit to build a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- R/L ASSOCIATES, INC. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hayes v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Phillips v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Foster v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Harrington v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Harrington v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.