Legal Opinion
Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P. v. Missouri Public Service Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2008No. 06-3701, 06-3726, 06-3727PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P., d/b/a SBC Missouri (SBC), attempted to negotiate interconnection agreements with several competitors (Competing Local Exchange Carriers (CLEC)) as required by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 47 U.S.C.). When those negotiations failed, the dispute was submitted to arbitration as provided for under the Act and the resulting arbitrator’s decision was adopted by the Missouri Public Service Commission (MPSC). SBC petitioned the district court 2 for review,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- At&T Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- SBC Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Competitive Telecommunications Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Firstcom, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Combs, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co., Inc. v. BoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. California Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.