Talk America, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
In these cases, we consider whether an incumbent provider of local telephone service must make certain transmission facilities available to competitors at cost-based rates. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission), as amicus curiae1 contends that its regulations require the incumbent provider to do so if the facilities are to be used for interconnection: to link the incumbent provider’s telephone network with the competitor’s network for the mutual exchange of traffic. We defer to the Commission’s views and reverse the judgment below.
I
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 (1996…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- City of Arlington v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Wilson v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.