Legal Opinion
Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. California Public Utilities Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 1, 2010No. 08-15568, 08-15716PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on March 4, 2010 [597 F.3d 958] is amended as follows:
Replace the following text on [597 F.3d at 965]:
Both the Seventh and the Eighth circuits recently rejected AT & T’s position, and have concluded that FCC regulations authorize state public utilities commissions to order incumbent LECs to lease entrance facilities to competitive LECs at regulated rates for the purpose of interconnection. See Sw. Bell Tel., LP v. Mo. Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 530 F.3d 676 (8th Cir.2008) (“SWBT”); Ill. Bell Tel. Co. v. Box, 526 F.3d 1069 (7th Cir. 2008) (“Box I”). We agree with our sister…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Webb v. Smart Document Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Covad Communications Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Western Radio Services Co. v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- CallerID4u, Inc. v. MCI Communications Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Dickenson-Russell Coal Company v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Global NAPs California, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- At & T Communications of CaliFornia, Inc. v. Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.