Borsalino Et Ux. v. City of Reading
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
These two appeals grow out of the same proceeding. They will be disposed of in one opinion.
The City of Reading, appellant in No. 325, by due and legal action of its city council, decided to construct a sewer on Second Street, and let the contract for its construction to T. M. Flanaghan, appellant in No. 327.
The appellees, who were property owners abutting on the street where said sewer was being constructed, averring that their property had been injured by the construction of the sewer and that such injury and damage was the necessary and unavoidable consequence of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Heinz's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Deihm v. SnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Lewisburg Bridge Co. v. County of UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Collins v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
- Fyfe v. Turtle Creek BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Locust Street Subway ConstructionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Phi Chi Fraternity T. U. Chapter Graduate Ass'n v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- George v. Lombardi, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1951
- Manor Township School District v. Counts, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1940
- Rissmiller v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1972