Legal Opinion

George v. Lombardi

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided January 22, 1951No. 1714Published

1Opinion of the Court

Levinthal, J.,

The question raised by defendants’ preliminary objections is whether owners whose property was damaged as the immediate and direct result of boring and blasting by municipal contractors may recover from the contractors in an assumpsit action.

Defendants’ contract with the City of Philadelphia provided that, in constructing the relief sewer, defendants “shall have charge and control of the entire work . . ., shall be deemed as independent contractor in respect to the work . . .” and “shall be alone liable and responsible for, and shall pay, any and all loss and damage sustained by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federoff Et Ux. v. Harrison Const. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Baier v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Hirsh v. Patrick McGovern, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Del Pizzo v. Middle West Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Locust Street Subway ConstructionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API