Legal Opinion

Locust Street Subway Construction

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1934No. Appeals 469 and 531PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The City of Philadelphia, pursuant to lawful authority, constructed subways on Broad Street and on Locust Street, respectively, and in the excavation, construction and improvement of the tunnel for said subway it was necessary to blast Yvith giant powder, dynamite and other high explosives. While doing this blasting for the tunnel construction in a careful and non-negligent manner, the direct, immediate, unavoidable and necessary results of said construction were such that the buildings of certain property owers abutting on said streets directly facing on said subway…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Soldiers and Sailors Memorial BridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Pennsylvania R. v. MarchantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Westmoreland Chemical & Color Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Stork v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Pennsylvania R. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Heil v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. SalardinoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  3. Clark v. City of New Castle, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1938
  4. Frackville Sewerage Co. v. JamesSchuylkill County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1936
  5. George v. Lombardi, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API